Home   -  Secondary structure  Comparative modelling  Contacts  Threading   - search   - FTP   - Mirrors    -   Bottom Explain scores

EVA sec results for: Prospect

Organisation of method specific results

 
 
METHOD about: ../../doc/explain_methods.html#PX_about_prospect
METHOD url: Prospect
METHOD quote: Y Xu, D Xu:: Protein threading using PROSPECT: Design and evaluation. Proteins, 40, 343-354, 2000. \n Y Xu, E C Uberbacher:: A polynomial-time algorithm for a class of protein threading problems. Journal of Computer Applications in Biosciences, 12, 511-517, 1996.
TYPE : sec
NPROT : 286
NWEEKS : 74
AVE_Q3 : 71.4
AVE_SOV: 67.9
NOTE 1 : here ALL results obtained for prospect are given, i.e. NOT those for a common subset!
NOTE 2 : all proteins evaluated had no SIGNIFICANT sequence identity to any protein of previously known structure!



Averages over all proteins
type date sots id Q3 Q3H%o Q3H%p Q3E%o Q3E%p Q3L%o Q3L%p sov sovH sovE sovL BAD info infoO infoP corrH corrE corrL class contDH contDE
sec2004_04_28dssppsum71.475775869756967.971.168.066.13.50.310.310.310.630.550.508216.79.07.9
sec2004_04_28dsspsig13.634353844141518.028.731.617.86.50.170.170.170.300.320.218148.910.510.0
sec2004_04_28dssperrsig0.8022220.840.921.01.61.81.00.380.010.010.010.010.010.01481.80.620.59
                         




Averages over each month
TypeMethodMonthNprotAverage Q3 for monthFile with details for month
secprospectALL 286 71.4  
secprospect2001_04 1 70.9 old/2001_04_prospect.html
secprospect2003_07 3 85.6 old/2003_07_prospect.html
secprospect2003_08 4 78.1 old/2003_08_prospect.html
secprospect2003_11 10 67.8 old/2003_11_prospect.html
secprospect2003_12 15 71.3 old/2003_12_prospect.html
secprospect2004_01 10 74.1 old/2004_01_prospect.html
secprospect2004_02 18 64.1 old/2004_02_prospect.html
secprospect2004_03 8 66.8 old/2004_03_prospect.html
secprospect2004_04 4 77.4 old/2004_04_prospect.html
secprospectALL 286 71.4  




Notations used (detailed explanation)

psum  percentage over all proteins
sig  standard deviation
errsig significant difference (to distinguish between two methods)
type   prediction type
date   date when added [yyyy_mm_dd]
sots   standard of truth
id   identifier of protein
Q3   three-state per-residue accuracy (percentage of correctly predicted residues)
Q3H%o   correctly predicted helix residues (percentage of helix observed)
Q3H%p   correctly predicted helix residues (percentage of helix predicted)
Q3E%o   correctly predicted strand residues (percentage of helix observed)
Q3E%p   correctly predicted strand residues (percentage of helix predicted)
Q3L%o   correctly predicted loop residues (percentage of helix observed)
Q3L%p   correctly predicted loop residues (percentage of helix predicted)
sov   per segment accuracy (three states)
sovH   per segment accuracy for helix residues
sovE   per segment accuracy for strand residues
sovL   per segment accuracy for non-regular residues
BAD   percentage of confused HELIX/STRAND residues (helix predicted as strand, strand predicted as helix)
infoO   information index accuracy (percentage of observed)
infoP   information index accuracy (percentage of predicted)
corrH   Matthews correlation index for helix
corrE   Matthews correlation index for strand
corrL   Matthews correlation index for loop
var   variance over all proteins (1/N-1)*( score(i) - )**2
sig   sigma (standard deviation) over all proteins (sqrt[var])
errsig   significant differences ( standard dev / sqrt(Nprot) )
Explain scores - Home   -   Secondary structure  Comparative modelling  Contacts  Threading   - search   - FTP   - Mirrors    -   Top